The Intel Xeon E5 v4 Review: Testing Broadwell-EP With Demanding Server Workloads
by Johan De Gelas on March 31, 2016 12:30 PM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
- Intel
- Xeon
- Enterprise
- Enterprise CPUs
- Broadwell
Xeon E5 v4 SKUs and Pricing
As of press time we don't have precise Xeon E5 v4 pricing. But overall prices seem to be about 1-2% higher than the comparable Xeon E5 v3..
Intel Xeon E5 v4 SKUs | ||||||
Cores/Threads | TDP | Base Clockspeed | Price | |||
E5-2699 v4 | 22/44 | 145W | 2.2GHz | $4115 | ||
E5-2698 v4 | 20/40 | 135W | 2.2GHz | $3228 | ||
E5-2697A v4 | 16/32 | 145W | 2.6GHz | $2891 | ||
E5-2697 v4 | 18/36 | 145W | 2.3GHz | $2702 | ||
E5-2695 v4 | 18/36 | 120W | 2.1GHz | $2424 | ||
E5-2690 v4 | 14/28 | 135W | 2.6GHz | $2090 | ||
E5-2687W v4 | 12/24 | 160W | 3.0GHz | $2141 | ||
E5-2683 v4 | 16/32 | 120W | 2.1GHz | $1846 | ||
E5-2680 v4 | 14/28 | 120W | 2.4GHz | $1745 | ||
E5-2667 v4 | 8/16 | 135W | 3.2GHz | $2057 | ||
E5-2660 v4 | 14/28 | 105W | 2.0GHz | $1445 | ||
E5-2650L v4 | 14/28 | 65W | 1.7GHz | $1329 | ||
E5-2650 v4 | 12/24 | 105W | 2.2GHz | $1166 | ||
E5-2643 v4 | 6/12 | 135W | 3.4GHz | $1552 | ||
E5-2640 v4 | 10/20 | 90W | 2.4GHz | $939 | ||
E5-2637 v4 | 4/8 | 135W | 3.5GHz | $996 | ||
E5-2630 v4 | 10/20 | 85W | 2.2GHz | $667 | ||
E5-2630L v4 | 10/20 | 55W | 1.8GHz | $612 | ||
E5-2623 v4 | 4/8 | 85W | 2.6GHz | $444 | ||
E5-2620 v4 | 8/16 | 85W | 2.1GHz | $417 | ||
E5-2609 v4 | 8/8 | 85W | 1.7GHz | $306 | ||
E5-2603 v4 | 6/6 | 85W | 1.7GHz | $213 |
Meanwhile Intel's own performance estimations are not exactly exhilarating. Their estimates are based upon the almost perfectly scaling SPECrate benchmarks, and even these "perfect world" gains are simply modest, almost uninspiring in fact. We have said it before: this market desperately needs some competition if we want a new generation to bring more exciting improvements in performance-per-dollar metrics..
112 Comments
View All Comments
Casper42 - Thursday, March 31, 2016 - link
HPE just dropped the 64GB LRDIMMs a week or two back.They are now exactly 2x the 32GB LRDIMM as far as List Price goes.
LRDIMMs across the board are 31% more expensive than RDIMMs.
wishgranter - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link
http://www.techpowerup.com/221459/samsung-starts-m...wishgranter - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link
While introducing a wide array of 10nm-class DDR4 modules with capacities ranging from 4GB for notebook PCs to 128GB for enterprise servers, Samsung will be extending its 20nm DRAM line-up with its new 10nm-class DRAM portfolio throughout the year.nathanddrews - Thursday, March 31, 2016 - link
Perf/W is obviously a very exciting metric for server farmers and it generally exciting from a basic technology perspective, but it's absolute performance isn't amazing. Anyway, it's not like I'll be buying one anyway. LOLasendra - Thursday, March 31, 2016 - link
This interest me in so far as this would be the updated processors in a supposedly-coming-this-year Mac Pro refresh. Not that I would personally fork that much cash, but I'm interested to see how much of a jump they will make.But things seam rather bleak. No wonder they decided to wait 3 years for a refresh.
MrSpadge - Thursday, March 31, 2016 - link
Not sure which years you're counting in, but for the majority of us it takes 1.5 years from 09/2014 to today.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haswell_%28microarch...
asendra - Thursday, March 31, 2016 - link
Apple didn't update the MacPros with Haswell-EP. They are still using Ivy Bridgetipoo - Thursday, March 31, 2016 - link
Wonder what they'll do on the GPU side though. Too early for next generation 14nm FF GPUs from anyone, if Nvidia was even a choice due to OpenCL politics. Another GCN 1.0 part in 2016 would be...A bag of hurt.
Still waiting on the high end 15" rMBP to have something better than GCN 1.0...The performance, shockingly, hasn't come all that far from even my Iris Pro model. Maybe double, which is something, but I'd like larger than that to upgrade from integrated...
extide - Thursday, March 31, 2016 - link
Nah, if they refresh it late this year, like in august or something like that, then 14/16nm FF GPU's will be available.At worst we would get GCN 1.2, but yeah it would suck to see 28nm GPU's put in there...
mdriftmeyer - Thursday, March 31, 2016 - link
On what planet do you not grasp FinFET 14nm end of June from AMD?