System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS AMD RX 570 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Corsair AX1200i power supply. This power supply is Platinum rated, and as I am on a 230 V supply, leads to ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power Long Idle (w/RX 570)

Power OS Idle (w/RX 570)

Power OCCT (w/RX 570)

The energy consumption figures of the ASRock X399 Professional Gaming are unsurprising, considering we already knew that the motherboard is using a processor boost/turbo mode by default. Energy consumption varies between 68 Watts while the system is idling and up to 254 Watts when the processor is fully loaded. The huge energy consumption difference is being caused by the overdriving of the already power-hungry Ryzen Threadripper 1950X processor. The power figures are close to those of most AMD X399 motherboards that we have tested to this date.

Non UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.) 

Non UEFI POST Time

The default boot time figures of the ASRock X399 Professional Gaming may appear to be the worst out of the motherboards that we have already tested but, from a practical point of view, the difference between the motherboards is unimportant. Enabling the Fast Boot option shortens the boot time down to 10.5 seconds, reducing the boot time by 4.1 seconds at the expense of initializing most of the motherboard's subsystems and connected devices during boot.

USB Backup

For this benchmark, we transfer a set size of files from the SSD to the USB drive using DiskBench, which monitors the time taken to transfer. The files transferred are a 1.52 GB set of 2867 files across 320 folders – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second HD videos. In an update to pre-Z87 testing, we also run MaxCPU to load up one of the threads during the test which improves general performance up to 15% by causing all the internal pathways to run at full speed.

Due to the introduction of USB 3.1, as of June 2015 we are adjusting our test to use a dual mSATA USB 3.1 Type-C device which should be capable of saturating both USB 3.0 and USB 3.1 connections. We still use the same data set as before, but now use the new device. Results are shown as seconds taken to complete the data transfer.

At this point we should also note that manufacturers nowadays advertise their motherboards as having "USB 3.1 Gen 1" and "USB 3.1 Gen 2" ports. The USB 3.1 Gen 1 ports are limited to 5 Gbps, which means that they are USB 3.0 ports. USB 3.1 Gen 2 ports are rated for up to 10 Gbps.

USB Copy Test, 2867 Files (1.52GB)

The ASRock X399 Professional Gaming shares the exact same USB performance as with all of the AMD X399 motherboards that we have tested to this date. All four motherboards are using the same chipsets for their USB 3.1 Gen 1 and USB 3.1 Gen 2 controllers and, naturally, there are no performance differences here.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time.  This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops, and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

As with all of the AMD X399 motherboards that we have tested to this date, the DPC latency of the ASRock X399 Professional Gaming is relatively high, yet not too high. Our highest recorded DPC latency was 310 μs, a figure that is not high enough to cause any performance concerns.

Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • bug77 - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    "However, with a price tag of $440, the X399 Professional Gaming also is one of the most expensive Ryzen Threadripper motherboards available."

    And yet, the title of the article says it's "for all".

    Also, Threadripper is a rather poor choice for gaming. Even if you're streaming, you don't need that many cores. Threadripper is really good is you massively edit photo or edit video or do 3D rendering and few other specialized things. But not for much else.
    This is not a criticism, with today's CPU one has to carefully weigh whether they need more cores or faster cores, depending on their usage patterns. There no universal solution like there was back in the single-core CPUs day. (And even then, if you didn't need FPU performance, a much cheaper AMD CPU could have been the better pick.)
  • Myrandex - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    Eh the original single core Athlon 64 CPUs even had pretty banging FPU performance back in the day too.
  • bug77 - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    True, but the original K6 didn't ;)
  • DanNeely - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    It's "10G For All", the for all is attached to the 10G ethernet support, meaning it's a thread-ripper board with 10G for both gaming and work station use. It's more expensive than general use boards of either category because the 10G controller is still seriously expensive. If you don't need 10G ethernet, it's probably not the board you want because of the price premium attached for it.
  • bug77 - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    So... it's not for all.
  • eek2121 - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    I would have to disagree there. Windows has hundreds of thousands of processes running in the background and when Threadripper is set up properly it performs great with gaming. Even if you do able 8 of the cores you can easily beat out the 1800X from an IPC perspective thanks to lower cache latencies (Threadripper has similar cache latencies to the 2700X). The higher XFR boost (4200hz), slightly better IPC, quad channel memory, and more cores means a better gaming experience than the 1800X...if you can afford it.
  • bug77 - Friday, July 6, 2018 - link

    I didn't say it performs poorly. But perf/$ isn't the best for many workflows.
  • Marlin1975 - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    It says Creative SoundBlaster on the cover yet the description says Onboard Audio Realtek ALC1220A?

    This just some marketing/software so it makes it seem nicer?
  • tmediaphotography - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    "It supports the Sound Blaster Cinema 3 software"

    Realtek hardware, but anyone who is perversely attached the Creative Labs software can feel free to install and use the Cinema 3 software.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, July 5, 2018 - link

    Sound blaster switched from custom hardware to just being a custom driver for other audio hardware a few years ago.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now