Power Delivery Thermal Analysis

A lot more focus has been put onto power delivery specifications and capabilities, not just by manufacturers, but as a result of users demands. In addition to the extra power benefits from things like overclocking, more efficient designs in power deliveries and cooling solutions aim to bring temperatures down. Although this isn't something most users ever need to worry about, certain enthusiasts are bringing more focus onto each boards power delivery. The more premium models tend to include bigger and higher-grade power deliveries, with bigger and more intricate heatsink designs, with some even providing water blocks on ranges such as the ASUS ROG Maximus Formula series.

The doubled 7+1 power delivery on the GIGABYTE Z490 Aorus Master

Testing Methodology

Our method of testing out if the power delivery and its heatsink are effective at dissipating heat, is by running an intensely heavy CPU workload for a prolonged method of time. We apply an overclock which is deemed safe and at the maximum that the silicon on our testbed processor allows. We then run the Prime95 with AVX2 enabled under a torture test for an hour at the maximum stable overclock we can which puts insane pressure on the processor. We collect our data via three different methods which include the following:

  • Taking a thermal image from a birds-eye view after an hour with a Flir Pro thermal imaging camera
  • Securing two probes on to the rear of the PCB, right underneath CPU VCore section of the power delivery for better parity in case a probe reports a faulty reading
  • Taking a reading of the VRM temperature from the sensor reading within the HWInfo monitoring application

The reason for using three different methods is that some sensors can read inaccurate temperatures, which can give very erratic results for users looking to gauge whether an overclock is too much pressure for the power delivery handle. With using a probe on the rear, it can also show the efficiency of the power stages and heatsinks as a wide margin between the probe and sensor temperature can show that the heatsink is dissipating heat and that the design is working, or that the internal sensor is massively wrong. To ensure our probe was accurate before testing, I binned 10 and selected the most accurate (within 1c of the actual temperature) for better parity in our testing.

To recreate a real-world testing scenario, the system is built into a conventional desktop chassis which is widely available. This is to show and alleviate issues when testing on open testbeds which we have done previously, which allows natural airflow to flow over the power delivery heatsinks. It provides a better comparison for the end-user and allows us to mitigate issues where heatsinks have been designed with airflow in mind, and those that have not. The idea of a heatsink is to allow effective dissipation of heat and not act as an insulator, with much more focus from consumers over the last couple of years on power delivery componentry and performance than in previous years.

For thermal image, we use a Flir One camera as it gives a good indication of where the heat is generated around the socket area, as some designs use different configurations and an evenly spread power delivery with good components will usually generate less heat. Manufacturers who use inefficient heatsinks and cheap out on power delivery components should run hotter than those who have invested. Of course, a $700 flagship motherboard is likely to outperform a cheaper $100 model under the same testing conditions, but it is still worth testing to see which vendors are doing things correctly. 

Thermal Analysis Results


We measured 58.4°C on the hottest part of the PCB around the power delivery

The GIGABYTE Z490 Aorus Master is using a 14+1 power delivery, with fourteen ISL99390 90 A power stages for the CPU VCore, and one SiC651 50 A power stage for the SoC. The power delivery is controlled by an Intersil ISL69269 PWM controller operating in a 7+1 configuration, with the fourteen ISL99390 power stages doubled up with seven ISL6617 doublers. It is cooled by a pair of heatsinks that are interconnected via a direct contact heat pipe.

In our power delivery thermal testing, the GIGABYTE Z490 Aorus Master is one of the best performers we've had installed into our motherboard test system. From our pair of K-type thermocouples, we saw temperatures of 48 and 46 degrees Celcius respectively, with a reading of 45 degrees celsius from the integrated thermal sensor on the board.

This is similar levels of performance we saw with the ASRock Z490 Taichi which is one of the board's main rivals on the market, and that model is using actively cooled heatsinks. One thing we've seen from GIGABYTE in 2020 is its ability to create an efficient power delivery, and keep them as cool as possible without the need for additional features such as cooling fans. All GIGABYTE needs now is a processor platform that doesn't spiral away into thermal oblivion.

Overclocking GIGABYTE Z490 Aorus Master Conclusion
Comments Locked

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • Deicidium369 - Thursday, January 7, 2021 - link

    They do CPU testing - did someone take them and sell them on Ebay?
  • Ian Cutress - Friday, January 8, 2021 - link

    We don't all work in a singular office. Ryan and I are several thousand miles away. We started the Intel 400-series testing with the 8 core and it's continued through.
  • anomalydesign - Friday, January 8, 2021 - link

    I'm surprised to see this review now with Z590 coming out in less than a week (and Gigabyte leaking their own Aorus lineup today, in fact).

    I guess it could still be a useful board to try and find on clearance for Rocket Lake (z590 doesn't seem to offer anything that you can't find on Z490, as far as I can tell), but testing a board of this level with a mid-tier CPU seems kind of crazy to me. I was wondering why the numbers looked so off until I realized I'd overlooked the 10700k in the testing notes. Very odd choice, for VRM analysis.
  • fogifds - Monday, January 11, 2021 - link

    Shouldn't I wait for Z590?
  • Tom Sunday - Friday, January 29, 2021 - link

    It does make sense to wait until the new Z590 boards hit the deck. Making sure that there are extra worth while boxes to be checked and seen and before making any $$$ jump. But we already know to get ready for sticker shock. Looked at the Z590 ASUS HERO VIII and this baby checks out at a cool $500. While BH has the Z490 Hero at around $379. If I only had the cash...but you know that drill.
  • rubi - Tuesday, January 12, 2021 - link

    wonder to see your stuff, i learned a lot of new things.
    https://odindownloads.net
  • NDRE28 - Monday, March 8, 2021 - link

    Yeah.
    Gigabyte is a very serious vendor.
    I own a Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Master, and it runs flawlessly.
    I also had other Gigabyte motherboards (non-Aorus) in the past and they all worked well.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now