New Branding: Intel, Intel Iris Xe, and Intel EVO

Since the introduction of Ice Lake, Intel’s logo design has seemed a bit off-kilter. The company changed how it named its processors, ditching the U and Y designations, instead of focusing on the ‘G7 and G4’ elements as well as the graphics. While those were Intel’s 10th Generation Core processors, they were categorized in a seemingly different way. Now a year later, changes are once again afoot. With the introduction of Xe graphics into the mix with Tiger Lake, the company is putting new logos and branding into the mix.

The new stickers on the laptops will look something like this. Intel has decided that its logos need to have a mix of lower case letters and capital letters for Core and Iris, despite the Intel part being in complete lower case and the ‘Graphics’ or ‘Powered By’ are all capitalized (at least it isn’t with backwards letters?). The Xe has that e in superscript as well, for the ‘eXascale for Everyone’ element of the graphics portfolio.

There is also Intel Evo, the new name for Intel’s Project Athena program, which we talk about later.

Beyond this is a full change for the Intel logo. It was stated that Intel only ever changes its logo when there is a big shift inside the industry. Today is apparently that shift, despite Intel's presentation being fairly minimal - I would have expected a logo change to occur during a large event or such. Intel says this is the third time it has fundamentally changed its logo.

Project Athena Becomes Intel Evo

With the launch of the previous generation of products, Intel introduced its Project Athena verification program. Similar to how it tried to push for ultraportable notebooks back in the day, Project Athena was a set of specifications that Intel believed were important to the premium notebook owners in the current day. This included things like minimum battery life requirements, support for Thunderbolt and Wi-Fi 6, a good display, support for AI, and a specific level of responsiveness.

In order for a laptop to be designated as a Project Athena design, it had to be validated by Intel. More often than not, Athena notebooks were co-developed with Intel anyway, making validation not much more than a formality. At the time Intel stated that Project Athena was more of an OEM standard to help push the industry along the leading edge – version 1.0 of the specification was ultimately a stepping stone to more stringent updates to the standard we learned.


Because Athena was a program designed for the OEMs rather than the customer, Intel had not necessarily worked out the marketing side of the equation. At a simple level, it was expected that these devices would, if they followed the specification, speak for themselves in offering better-than-normal user experiences equipped with the latest technology. However, at some point, we expected Athena to become end-user visible as well.

So for this Tiger Lake launch, Athena is now getting that splash of marketing, and Intel is calling any device that qualifies under the latest updates as ‘Intel Evo’. The Evo part of the name is clearly meant to be a calling to the evolution of the future generation of products.

What surprises me a bit is that the first generation of Athena was meant to be, at least on some level, CPU vendor agnostic – some of the special sauce from Intel made it easier for Intel devices to meet the specification, such as built in Thunderbolt and CNVi-based Wi-Fi 6 reduces the power consumption. With Intel Evo branding, any semblance of it being an industry-wide specification to work towards now goes out the window. While any Evo qualification is still a good thing to have, with the promise of a good user experience and the latest technology, there’s no escaping the fact that this program is now honed in for Intel-specific systems.

Intel 11th Gen Core Tiger Lake Performance

As usual, posting performance numbers isn’t really our thing – we prefer to get the hardware on hand and test for ourselves. Intel has a habit of not stating full system configurations during its presentations, and rather directing the press to look at a section on a website after the fact. To that end, we’re not going to republish reams of Intel’s own numbers here. The high level numbers that are perhaps with promoting are as follows.

When comparing an Intel Core i7-1165G7 Tiger Lake system to an AMD Ryzen 7 4800U system (both configurations unknown at this point), Intel states it has the following performance advantages:

  • +28% Compute (SYSmark 25)
  • +67% Graphics (3DMark Fire Strike)
  • +300% AI (MLPerf)

As always, Intel’s need to promote ‘performance using real world benchmarks’ rubs up against the fact that it also posts these sorts of synthetic tests as well – especially when system configurations are no longer provided directly where the numbers are in the presentation. Intel does have ‘real world benchmarks’, directly in the next slide, but for slide #4 in a day of announcements, offering synthetics – especially ones that are known to favor Intel – is a bit frustrating. Surely an aggregate number of those real-world tests would be a better starting point for any presentation.

We will be doing our own testing when we get a Tiger Lake system in for testing.

Coming Next: Devices and Future Intel Announcements

Now that Intel’s Tiger Lake mobile processors are announced, OEM partners will also be announcing notebooks and laptops in the upcoming weeks – in fact a few will do so today. The other half of Tiger Lake still needs to be disclosed – at Architecture Day we were told that Tiger Lake scales to 65 watts, so most of us has assumed that this means a 45W to 65W range of processors, up to 8 cores, is coming. No word on that from Intel as of yet.

As a final slide from Intel’s deck, the company has clarified what to expect from its next few announcements (which we assume is from now through to the end of the year, at least from the client side of the business).

We should expect to see Intel Pentium and Celeron notebook processors later this year, along with the vPro versions of the Tiger Lake processors announced today. Perhaps more exciting is the DG1 discrete graphics platform, which is also promising to show its head. Given the recent high-end graphics announcements, it’s going to be fun playing with something more mid-range.

Intel Launches 11th Gen Core
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • RedOnlyFan - Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - link

    They are referring to drivers and bios updates for Intel. Amd's bios/drivers was has been a bit janky.
  • StevoLincolnite - Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - link

    I have used AMD, Intel and nVidia GPU's at various points for decades, they have all been fine, they have all had "rough spots".

    I.E. With the older GMA x3100 drivers Intel's GPU would take a performance hit whenever there was a 2D overlay.

    nVidia had driver cheats during the FX days.

    AMD had frame pacing during the early GCN days.

    But we also need to keep in mind that GPU drivers these days have more lines of code than most operating system kernels, which is absolutely nuts to think about, it's going to take time to get stuff right, mistakes will be made.
    AMD, nVidia and Intel are all the same in this regard.

    This brand loyalty/fanboyism is just hilarious and not beneficial to the consumer.

    Currently running a Radeon RX 580 in a PC and it's rock solid, no issues, running a Geforce 1660 in another rig, again... Rock solid, no issues.
    Running an Intel compute stick in yet another rig, rock solid, no issues.
  • vladx - Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - link

    @StevoLincolnite: I have owned dozens GPUs from both AMD/ATI and nVidia since the 90's and there hasn't been a GPU or CPU launch from AMD/ATI without GPU/chipset drivers issues. Even the great Athlon generation(I had an Athlon XP 2500+ Barton at the time) had issues with memory stability.

    Meanwhile Intel chipset/iGPU drivers since the 90's have been rock solid, while nVidia had very few gens with problems.
  • caqde - Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - link

    The Athlon XP's memory stability would have been a chipset issue. AMD didn't make chipset's for their systems at that time. Well they has the AMD 750 (Athlon Thunderbird (B) gen chipset) and 760 chipset (Thunderbird (C) generation), but those were early in the sockets lifetime and were not common on the market. With that in consideration you were specifying the Barton 2500+ so your choices were an Sis (746FX or 748), VIA KT333/400, or the coveted but UNSTABLE NFORCE 2 . I owned one of those. And I know AMD did not make the chipset for that platform. Also remember the memory controller was part of the chipset. VIA would have been in control of any memory issues. Most blame would be on VIA, SiS, or Nvidia not AMD.

    As a note there are multiple reports of Intel issues. Not sure how you missed out on those. Like the early self destructing SATA ports on the first gen i7 motherboards. I also remember platform issues with one of Intel's ****well-E based platforms dealing with early firmware problems. I know AMD's Zen platform had issues, but Intel is certainly not without theirs.

    Nvidia has also had plenty of problems, their chipsets (AMD 64 era) cause lots of problems when moving to the Vista OS being a major cause of crashes for the Vista platform. They have had multiple GPU's that had been recalled for self destructing in notebooks due to overheating issues.
  • caqde - Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - link

    I should clarify the Nforce 2 statement. That chipset was known for it's performance, but it was by far not the most stable platform of that era. The VIA platform was slower, but from what I could tell they were much stable.
  • alufan - Thursday, September 3, 2020 - link

    Had a DFI Lanparty Mobo with the Nforce it was dog rough for the first few months then they fixed it but BSODs were common even at idle
  • 5080 - Saturday, September 5, 2020 - link

    And the nforce chipset burned out on certain notebooks from HP.
  • Luminar - Thursday, September 3, 2020 - link

    Talk about living 10 to 20 years in the past.
  • vladx - Thursday, September 3, 2020 - link

    @Luminar: As previously stated, I also owned a RX480, RX580 and RX590 so I'm not living in the past at all. Also tested a 5700 XT which had lots of gfx artifacting in games. My point is, with almost no exception AMD and ATI have had drivers issues since before the new millenium.
  • ihatepaidtrolls - Thursday, September 3, 2020 - link

    @vladx clearly a pebcak issue

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now