It was only last quarter that Intel reported record revenues for a Q4 in the company’s history, and only three months later the company is making dramatic cuts to their workforce. With the job cuts only just announced, the company then released their first quarter results of fiscal year 2016.

On a GAAP basis, the news is not quite what you would expect for a company that is slashing its operating costs through employee reductions. Revenue for the quarter came in at $13.7 billion, which is up 7% year-over-year. Some of the gain though can be attributed to changes in Intel’s reporting methods, as it has aligned its fiscal year with the calendar year, resulting in an extra week of time for this quarter compared to a typical quarter. Perhaps a more telling result is Intel’s gross margin, which fell to 59.3% for Q1, down 1.2% from last year. Operating income was flat despite the gain in revenue, coming in at $2.6 billion. Net income was up 3% to $2.046 billion, and earnings per share were up 2% to $0.42.

Intel Q1 2016 Financial Results (GAAP)
  Q1'2016 Q4'2015 Q1'2015
Revenue $13.7B $14.9B $12.8B
Operating Income $2.6B $4.3B $2.6B
Net Income $2.0B $3.6B $2.0B
Gross Margin 59.3% 64.3% 60.5%
Client Computing Group Revenue $7.5B -13.8% +1.74%
Data Center Group Revenue $4.0B -7.17% +8.64%
Internet of Things Revenue $651M +4.16% +22.14%
Non-Volatile Memory Solutions Group $557M -14.83% -5.91%
Intel Security Group $537M +4.88% +12.11%
Programmable Solutions Group $359M - -
All Other Revenue $50M -15.25 -34.21%

Intel also reports Non-GAAP results which exclude certain factors such as acquisition costs, deferred revenue write-downs, inventory valuation adjustments, restructuring charges, and a few other factors. On a Non-GAAP basis, revenue was up 8% to $13.8 billion, gross margin was up 1.3% to 62,7%, operating income was up 13% to $3.3 billion, net income was up 19% to $2.6 billion, and earnings per share came in at $0.54, which is up 20% year-over-year. One of the big factors in the non-GAAP numbers are due to the acquisition of Altera, which was completed early in fiscal year 2016.

The Client Computing group is the largest part of Intel on a revenue basis, and is the one that is feeling the pressure of the declining PC market the most. This segment had $7.5 billion in revenue for the quarter, which is up 2% from the same time last year, but breaking down the numbers we see that there was a decrease in volume of sales of 15%, but the average selling price increase of 19% means there was a small gain year-over-year. Operating income for this segment was $1.9 billion, which is up from the $1.4 billion a year ago. Notebook chips had a flat average selling price, and saw a 2% decrease in volume, while desktop chips sales fell 4% but had a 6% increase in average selling price. Tablet sales saw the biggest hit, down 44% to 4 million units. The tablet market has not matured at the rate initially expected, and Intel has gotten rid of the contra-revenue plan to boost tablet sales, so this is not unexpected. With strong competition from ARM based designs in this segment, Intel is hoping design wins in 2-in-1 devices will help.

The Data Center Group was almost the opposite, with a strong growth in unit sales, up 13% from a year ago, but average selling price fell 3%. Revenue for this group was $4 billion, up from $3.7 billion a year ago, but with the decline in ASP the operating income was only up $65 million to $1.764 billion for the quarter.

Internet of Things posted revenue of $661 million, up from $533 million a year ago. The growth continues in operating income for this new segment of Intel, which saw a 41% gain over last year, and was at $123 million for the quarter.

Intel also has some new reporting segments this quarter. They have added Non-Volatile Memory Solutions, Intel Security Group, and Programmable Solutions Group. The latter is a new segment based on their acquisition of Altera and will be for their expanded FPGA business. The others are branching off from Software and Services and All Other.

Non-Volatile Memory had a drop in revenue of about 6%, to $557 million, and took a $95 million operating loss for the quarter, down from $72 million in operating income last year. The Intel Security Group had revenues up 12% to $537 million, and operating income up to $85 million for the quarter, which is an increase of 286% over the $22 million last year. The Programmable Solutions Group, being a new addition to Intel, only has results from this quarter, which were $359 million in revenue and $200 million in operating loss with the acquisition costs.

Finally, the All Other group had revenue of $50 million, and had an operating loss of $994 million for the quarter. Intel used to have quite a bit of technology under All Other, but with the new reporting groups much of that has been shifted out. It now features operations from the “New Technology Group” as well as restructuring charges, employee benefits, and other expenses.

Clearly with the large layoffs announced today, Intel is trying to refocus its efforts on markets where it can continue to grow. Their success in the PC market has been quite pronounced, but with that major market shifting to slower upgrades and fewer unit sales, Intel is going to try again to go after markets where it sees opportunities. One such market was mobile, but Intel was very slow out of the gate to latch on to that, and we are only now seeing Atom parts on a regular update cadence with Goldmont announced for later in the year. Airmont cores never even found their way into a smartphone SoC, meaning that any Intel powered phones were still the older 22nm cores.

It's unlikely anyone but investors like to see companies shed so much of their workforce, and this could be a big impact on Intel in the future with fewer resources to throw at problems, but it could also mean a leaner, more agile company. Time will tell on that story.

Looking at the immediate future, Intel has forecasted revenue of $13.5 billion, plus or minus $500 million for next quarter, which will return to a 13-week quarter as well. Non-GAAP margin is expected to be 61%, plus or minus a couple of percentage points (and yes that’s pretty vague), and with the job cuts they are expecting to take a one time charge of $1.2 billion.

I think Intel has weathered the slowdown in the PC market better than most companies, but they are not immune to the effects, and today we see them trying to offset those losses and move into new markets to win back some of their margin. We’ll keep an eye on their results over the next several quarters and see how they do. They are already getting 40% of their revenue and 60% of their margin from non-PC segments, so they see a good opportunity here to expand that.

Source: Intel Investor Relations

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • junky77 - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    "Lower Margins Prompt Workforce Adjustments"

    They don't prompt anything, margins don't have intelligence or motivation. And they don't "prompt", they are an excuse.
    It would be nicer if you could either provide the news as they are OR question the viewpoint a bit. Intel is a corporation which doing stuff for money and that's all. Like the others. Even the technology is secondary.
  • Murloc - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    transitive verb
    : to move to action : incite
    : to assist (one acting or reciting) by suggesting or saying the next words of something forgotten or imperfectly learned : cue
    : to serve as the inciting cause of <evidence prompting an investigation>


    You are wrong and a nitpicker.
    This is a common figure of speech and you're bashing the author over using it.

    Lower margins DID prompt the adjustments exactly because Intel is a corporation which is doing stuff for money (duh!).
    There is no viewpoint to question here.
    Maybe you'd have liked reading some rambling about evil corporations in the article, is that it?
  • junky77 - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    1. There is a reason for choosing specific "figure of speech". There is more to words, language and media then the dictionary

    2. No viewpoint to question? are you sure?

    3. No, I didn't expect. Except, I would like to see some questioning, yes, and some thinking about such matters.

    4. Not related to "evil corporations".
  • madwolfa - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    Yeesh, it's just a figure of speech.
  • junky77 - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    As replied above. The figures of speech used somehow don't shed light on any political matter. You can analyze it, or you can think that this is the nature and big truth or something like that.
  • stadisticado - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    You know public corporations are legally bound to make as much money as possible for their shareholders, right? If you expect other behavior, they have to stay or go private, much like Dell recently did.
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    Wroooong. This gets trotted out a lot and it isn't true.
  • Krysto - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    > The Client Computing group is the largest part of Intel on a revenue basis, and is the one that is feeling the pressure of the declining PC market the most.

    Well, maybe Intel will start making Atom-based "Core i3 and Core i5" next - you know, to "increase profits". Or maybe a single-core Core i7. Because why the hell not? They've already sh*t all over their Celeron and Pentium brands with the switch to Atom, and have already started making dual-core Core i7s. So nothing will shock me anymore.
  • Anato - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    On the bright side, GPU occupies more die area than CPU core(s), so you pay and get same amount of die than before.
  • Krysto - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    If that mattered that much, AMD would've done better with its APUs in the market. Ironically, AMD's APUs have MUCH better single-thread performance than Intel's Celerons and Pentiums now at the same price points.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now