Pre-AM2 Mid-Range Buyers' Guide, May 2006
by Jarred Walton on May 9, 2006 6:30 AM EST- Posted in
- Guides
Speakers and Accessories
All we're missing now are some speakers, a keyboard, and a mouse. This is one area where you can pretty much get whatever you want, but we will list a couple of recommendations just to complete the price. If you already have speakers, there's probably no reason to buy new speakers unless you really want to. Keyboard and mice are subjective, and while I still prefer Logitech and Microsoft models, just about anything will work. If you like wireless input devices, you can go that route as well, though we would caution against buying any of the cheaper models. Cheap plus wireless often means you will get flaky response from your peripherals, and for most situations I still prefer a wired keyboard and mouse. |
| Click to enlarge |
Speaker Recommendation: Logitech X-530 5.1 70W Speakers
Price: $62 shipped (Retail)
"If it's not broke, don't fix it." I've been recommending Logitech's cheap 5.1 speakers for budget and midrange computers pretty much since I started writing Buyers' Guides. The simple fact of the matter is that they work well, sound decent, and have an impressively low price. No one is going to mistake the X-530 speakers for some Klipsch 5.1 cans, but unless you're an audiophile, you probably don't care. For playing games as well is watching movies and listening to some music, these Logitech speakers will get the job done.
 |
| Click to enlarge |
Keyboard and Mouse: Microsoft Comfort Curve 2000 B2L-00047
Price: $32 shipped (Retail)
I like the old Microsoft Natural keyboards, but not everyone likes ergonomic split-key layouts. The Microsoft Comfort Curve strikes something of a middle ground, so if you don't like split-key arrangements, you might like this. There are additional "multimedia" and application buttons along the top of the keyboard that can be somewhat useful, and about the only complaint some people will have is that the keyboard is relatively large. Along with the keyboard you get the standard three button Microsoft optical mouse, and although you don't get any extra buttons it's still a good mouse. Logitech keyboards and mice can often be found for a few dollars less, but since you use the keyboard and mouse to actually interface with the computer, get something that you find comfortable. (Or you could always try speech recognition, right?)
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
56 Comments
View All Comments
ZJB298 - Wednesday, May 17, 2006 - link
K, so I'm a huge newb, but what's the point of getting or switching to X16 over X8 if there is no performance impact? Is there likely to be more of a performance impact for a gamer or a higher-end graphics card than for a normal user?Basically, is it worth it for me to go searching for another, more expensive motherboard with X16 slots over X8 slots?
JarredWalton - Saturday, May 20, 2006 - link
In my opinion, NO! Dual X16 is just a lot of marketing hype. The board that sport it might benchmark faster at times (by 5% or so), but 5% can be had through BIOS optimizations.Crassus - Tuesday, May 9, 2006 - link
Thanks for a new Buyer's Guide. I wondered when the next one would come for quite some time. It maybe not necessary to bring them as often as when they started, but right now I think they're spaced a wee bit too far apart.It's always a very helpful read and I use it not only as a recommendation of what to buy, but also as an indication of where the industry stands at this time, i.e. what the standard is for any given component. Keep up the good work and (maybe) update them a little more often again.
sabrewulf - Tuesday, May 9, 2006 - link
"Plenty of people are still running old socket 478, 462, and 754 systems, and they're perfectly happy with the level of performance and they have. The latest and greatest computer games almost certainly wouldn't run on those older systems without drastically reducing the graphics quality"754 + PCI-E = perfectly capable of running with maximum eye-candy.
LoneWolf15 - Tuesday, May 9, 2006 - link
And the percentage of Socket 754 mainboards with PCI-E is?Socket 754 performance is decent, but it's truly a dead-end. For hard-core gamers, I'd urge them to get out while they can sell their parts for reasonable cost, much like I'd have said to Socket 423 owners when the P4 switched to 478.
JarredWalton - Tuesday, May 9, 2006 - link
Notice the "OLD" socket 754 part? Obviously, newer 754 PCIe boards are okay. LOL I still do a ton of work on my 754 + 6800GT system, though.sabrewulf - Friday, May 12, 2006 - link
Sorry I guess I didn't notice that word. I'm mostly just speaking up for people like my brother who last year wanted to upgrade his graphics card, but already has a 2.4 ghz 754 chip and couldn't afford a new video card AND an equivalent 939 CPU at the same time, so he got a cheap solid 754 PCI-E board instead. Works great for him, and with AM2 right around the corner, it looks like an even smarter purchase since he can pretty much skip 939 altogether.LoneWolf15 - Tuesday, May 9, 2006 - link
The thought of Socket AM2 didn't excite me, but not just because of the lack of performance. So I think this Upgrade Guide makes a lot of sense (well, at least if you don't need to do a mainboard upgrade at present time).Just the thought of having to completely reload Windows XP was enough to cause me (a month ago) to decide it was better to upgrade to 2GB of DDR and go from a Winchester 3000+ to an Athlon 64 X2 3800+, with no mainboard swap required. My MSI Neo 4 Platinum has been a good board. I plan on getting one year more at the very least out of it before I consider the new platform. I'm sure AM2 is the best option for anyone who still has an Athlon XP (unless they don't wish to save by not swapping out RAM) and that waiting for new Intel hardware is the best solution for anyone who currently has a Socket 478 system or earlier, but now that I have a system board I'm completely happy with, it's really hard to justify an upgrade that would require me to gut the OS...I no longer have that kind of time on a regular basis.
APKasten - Tuesday, May 9, 2006 - link
I find it really hard to believe that 1GB of PC3200, even at low latencies, is worth almost $200. I can get 2 GB at higher latency (4-4-4-7) for about $150! Is the performance boost really worth that much money for just 1 GB? I was always under the impression that more RAM was better than having extra low latency RAM.I took AnandTech's recommendation to get the OCZ EL 512MB (2x256MB) Kit (2.5-3-2-6?) a few years ago. I replaced that with a GeIL 1 GB (2x512MB) kit at 4-4-4-7 last year and I have since had much better performance from my system. That was the only thing I changed on my box. So I guess my real question is, wouldn't 2 GB at higher latencies be better than 1 GB at lower latencies, bang-for-buck-wise?
APKasten - Tuesday, May 9, 2006 - link
Holy crap. Nevermind...I just realized that it was a 2GB kit you were talking about in the article.Sorry. *rolls eyes*